正能量

Military Experts: CIA & NATO Commandos Deployed in Ukraine Show Kiev is Proxy in US War on Russia_我的网站

A |     今年，做了6年炒货生意的唐山市路北区商户董朝辉有了“新伙伴”——智能炒货机器人。

B |     "I believe the New York Times report is correct in every detail," says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA station chief and military intelligence officer. "It is what I have been hearing. There is considerable training at the Grafenwoehr, Germany army base to familiarize the Ukrainians with the new weapons arriving. Meanwhile there are cadres of special operations soldiers and intelligence personnel operating primarily in western Ukraine. They are not in uniform and many of them are working under various cover designations, including sometimes loose affiliations with foreign embassies and NGOs. All of which means that Biden and other Western leaders are lying about their active participation in the conflict.",Ahead of the Russian special operation to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, the US withdrew its own 150 military instructors. However, some CIA operatives continued their service in the country secretly, directing most of the intelligence flow the US is sharing with Ukrainian forces, according to the NYT. In addition to that, commandos from Washington's NATO allies have been managing the flow of weapons and equipment in Ukraine and providing training. The NYT specifies, citing American and other Western officials that the commandos are not on the front lines with Ukrainian troops.,Even though the US and NATO member states do not acknowledge that their personnel are operating in Ukraine, Russia and other intelligence services around the world are aware of this, according to the newspaper.,"The potential downside for the president comes when some of these soldiers in mufti get killed or, worse, captured and start to talk about their role," says Giraldi. "The Biden Administration has staked its reputation and possible political future on enabling Ukraine to survive without succumbing to Russian demands.",Deploying CIA personnel (which encompasses military as well as intelligence operatives) "is completely typical of the initial stages of a US-backed long war, and for long-term political manipulation of the target country," according to retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Department of Defense.,"This is the future that neoconservative 'strategists' in DC and their British and European allies imagine for Ukraine," Kwiatkowski highlights. "Rather than a negotiated conclusion, with a new Ukrainian role as a neutral and productive country, independent of both Russian and US political influences, the US government and CIA see Ukraine as an expendable yet useful satrap in its competition with the Russian Federation.",The ex-DoD analyst emphasizes that the effort is serious, given that the funding for CIA operations and arms sales and support and training has been flowing freely from Congress and President Biden. It also means that the intel operations in and around Ukraine are "of critical importance" to Washington, according to her.,Situation in UkraineNATO is De Facto at War With Russia but is Using Ukraine as a Tool, US Scholar Says5 April, 17:37 GMT,Ukraine is Washington's Proxy in Effort to Destroy Russia,"Ukraine was being used long before 2021 and 2022, as a US proxy, for global money laundering by multiple players, and for CIA political operations," explains Kwiatkowski. "The US diplomats and the CIA view Ukraine and its various people as pawns on a chessboard they can manage. Given that the US people are not willing to engage in a ground or air war with Russia over Ukraine, those pawns might need to be preserved for the next stage.",Washington's current interest in Ukraine dates back to at least the George W. Bush era, and probably much earlier, with the US foreign policy establishment making steady efforts to drive a wedge between Russia and its neighbor, according to the military veteran. Washington has made considerable financial, diplomatic and political investment in Ukraine over the recent decades and it cannot afford "losing" it.,"Coming on the heels of similar 'losses' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and potentially some of the Gulf states, there are those in Washington who would find the complete loss of Ukraine unacceptable," she stresses.,The US is equally involved in former Soviet and Warsaw Pact countries, such as Lithuania, and Poland, to take the post-Soviet space under control "as part of the war to maintain US influence and contain Russian influence," according to the former Pentagon analyst. "Recent Lithuanian steps to enforce EU sanctions on the Russian Baltic Sea trade port and naval city of Kaliningrad speaks to the nature of what is to come, in the eyes of the US strategists," she points out.,"Ukraine is a proxy; the West is trying to destroy Russia, it's that simple," echoes Larry Johnson, a veteran of the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, which provided training to the US Military’s Special Operations taskforce for 24 years. "It would be one thing if Russia was the most evil, oppressive, authoritarian regime in the world. It's nowhere even close. Even though the West keeps trying to portray Russia as such. The fact of the matter is, the West wants the resources that Russia has and it wants to control Russia. Russia is not about to be controlled.",Situation in UkraineEx-CIA Analyst: US Military Aid Not a Game Changer for Kiev, Ukraine Has Already Lost6 June, 16:31 GMT,US Trying to Find the Way Out of Ukraine's Mess,Despite CIA and NATO personnel being deployed in Ukraine and NATO weapons constantly flowing to the country, Ukrainian troops have been increasingly outgunned by DPR/LPR military groups backed by Russia, acknowledges the NYT.,The newspaper names a number of reasons behind the Ukrainian Armed Forces' failures, including limited time for training to use sophisticated NATO weapons; huge losses among the "most battle-hardened" and well-trained Ukrainian forces; and certain limits to the expertise of the CIA, which is traditionally focused on counter-intelligence, among other matters.,"This is the fault of Hollywood," says Johnson. "There's always the assumption that all these CIA personnel are really some terrific people. They've got magical training capabilities. They don't. The CIA hasn't won a single insurgent war in the last 40 years, except going back to supporting the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They're hoping to try to recreate that miracle. But again, the problem is the people who are assigned militarily to this kind of CIA activity are either retired, special forces, special operations personnel who had to get out because they were either physically unable to perform according to military standards, or it's people who've always wanted to do that kind of thing but really have had no special training in it.",Situation in UkraineUS Military Expert: Russia to Score Major Victories in Donbass, Must Adapt to New NATO Game22 May, 17:55 GMT,The former CIA analyst raises the question about the timing of the NYT exposure. He notes that it has never been a secret that in every foreign conflict the US was interested in, the US has routinely provided training and assistance, and dispatched the CIA's Special Activities Division to operate on the ground. Why is NYT openly writing about it now?,"I think the answer lies in the very last paragraph, last sentence of the article, where it is said: 'Would the enhancement of training be worth the possible price that is going to have to be paid?' The answer is 'probably not.' In other words, this is a gesture to show 'yeah, look, we're doing everything we can do to help the Ukrainians, we've provided we've provided special forces, special operations forces, we've brought them into other countries, we're sending our own people there, the CIA and their passive intelligence, so they can target Russian positions.' But when all is said and done, doing more is not going to really help.",According to Johnson, the NYT piece is "really sending a signal that the United States is trying to figure out how to disengage from this mess.","I think the purpose of this article coming out now is just to lay the groundwork for why we can't put or shouldn't put any more US military personnel or even CIA personnel inside Ukraine," the CIA veteran emphasizes. "Because continuing to put US personnel, whether they're CIA or military, inside Ukraine to train, is becoming too risky because of Russia's success on the battlefield."。

C | 8月18日上午，董朝辉打开手机软件，轻轻点击开始键，智能炒货机器人随即启动，自动完成预热、上料等工序。没过多久，色泽均匀的熟瓜子从出料口滑落，香气弥漫开来。“炒瓜子看似很简单，其实要求很高。温度差两三度，味道就差不少。”董朝辉说，过去炒制一锅好货全凭经验，品质常有起伏，如今使用智能炒货机器人一键操作，不但火候均匀、口感一致，还有盐炒、清炒等多种模式，省心又便捷。董朝辉的“新伙伴”——智能炒货机器人出自唐山酷微自动化科技有限公司。在公司生产车间，十余台长1.1米、宽0.6米、高1.2米的智能炒货机器人被打包装箱，即将发往湖南、四川等地。“这款机器人能感知环境温湿度、原料含水率，自主调整炒制节奏，实现炒制全流程无人化作业。”公司总经理万大顺介绍。凭借稳定性能和标准化炒制效果，智能炒货机器人一经推出就深受市场欢迎。目前，唐山酷微月均生产设备近百台，订单已排到今年年底。订单火爆的背后，与万大顺的从业经历有关。

D | 此前，他经营连锁炒货店，门店一度扩张到40余家。规模上去了，问题也随之而来，手艺过硬的炒货师傅稀缺，各门店炒制水准参差不齐，很难做到口味一致。

E | 行业痛点恰恰蕴藏着转型升级的机遇。2024年5月，万大顺决定换赛道发展，从卖炒货转向生产加工设备，把老师傅的经验变成标准化数据，打造一款风味恒定、操控稳定的智能炒货机器人。跨赛道发展，可没那么简单，技术研发、生产制造、市场开拓，每一关都不容易。“在经营炒货店时，我们一直使用的是半自动设备，有一定的技术积累。”万大顺介绍，在此基础上，公司引入多模态感知、AI智能决策、物联网云平台等前沿技术，把老师傅们的炒制过程拆解成上千组参数，依托海量炒制数据形成可追溯、可复制的数字工艺包，破解传统炒制容易出现的粘锅、配料比不稳定等难题。

F | 随后，万大顺拿着设计方案，找到唐山百川机器人共享制造工厂，依托其成熟的制造能力完成结构件生产。

G | 企业自己的技术团队则负责硬件集成组装和整机调试，样机从图纸到落地仅用了四个月。

H | “如今，设备已迭代到3.0版本，稳定性、感知精度进一步提升，并实现了批量生产。”万大顺说。打开销路又是一道难题。唐山酷微跳出线下跑客户的传统模式，将智能炒货机器人搬到线上平台，让设备自己“表演”。

I | “智能炒货机器人一上线，就吸引了全国各地客商关注。

J | 有一位威海客商一次就预订了20台。”万大顺说，良好的市场反馈快速积累起行业口碑，订单接踵而至，产品供不应求。“目前，智能炒货机器人已在个体门店、连锁品牌、新零售终端等多种场景应用。”万大顺说，公司正持续优化设备，新增无线网络互联、双语操作系统等功能，提升产品综合适配能力，为拓展国外市场做足准备。（日报记者 师源）。

Current article:http://vdqk.cesangrangshunzashuangruijiu.pics/h0thpm/20260826/8561189.html

Published on:21:08:58